About alicia101 Name: alicia101    in London, Middlesex United Kingdom Seller Rating:  7.67 (Very Good) (see 3 ratings) Sign up date: Oct 4, 2001 12:46:56 PM EDT Last Logged In:  Aug 20, 2003 10:52:30 AM EDT Current Record: Non-cancelled:  8 Bid Requests Bids Accepted On:  8 Bid Requests Work Accepted and Paid:  8 Bid Requests Security Verifications:  Good Completed verifications: Type 1: Initial User Verification The more verifications a Buyer has completed, the more credit worthiness they have physically demonstrated. (Why do we security verify Buyers?) Buyers, click here to pre-verify. 'Non-action' Ratio: (What is this?) (Bad - 68.18%) This buyer did not select a coder on 15 out of 22 bid requests which is more non-actions than the average buyer (who does so on 48.86%). Private auctions are not counted in these stats. Click here to View them. Note: This will not show items that have been 'hidden' by Rent A Coder staff for violations. Arbitrations Lost:  1 (out of 1 Arbitrations) What is arbitration? Rent A Coder Bid Request History All ratings and comments are the opinion of the poster and do not reflect the official view of Rent A Coder. Rated For Rated By Rating Rated On   System Specification Report *CodeWarrior* None Given July 16, 2003 9:03:21 PM EDT       Very simple PERL script rcs 10 (Excellent) July 5, 2003 3:00:41 AM EDT   Excellent buyer. Was clear about what she wanted to do, understood the difficulties and was open to my solution. Paid promptly with a bonus.     Bonus for Previous Project rcs None Given July 4, 2003 8:22:48 PM EDT       Memory Meter Clone PeteSIV 3 (Poor) June 27, 2003 6:03:08 PM EDT   Upon completion of the project (which took less than an hour from her selecting me as a coder), Buyer indicated heavy changes in the specifications, asking for entirely new features such as the dynamic unloading of DLLs and other such memory-freeing features, although I did assist in showing her how to make one simple change in the behavior of the program. Code was fully documented, almost down to every line of code and the finished project was an exact duplicate of what she wanted, minus, of course, the invisible spyware install that the original program comes with. I was friendly and courteous in my responses, not to mention quick, even though it took the Buyer a number of days from the time she accepted the source code and was able to compile it until she finally accepted the source code. To top it all off, she rated me a 7, which I don't agree with considering the project was done flawlessly, well before the project due date, friendly, and very inexpensive. I don't see what I could have improved on and since the Buyer failed to leave any remarks with that rating, I likely won't know. In summary: poor response time, multiple attempts to change project specifications, and unfair ratings on my qualifications and service as a programmer gives this Buyer a final ranking of 3 in my book. Buyer, if and when you read this, consider a more professional and fair approach in your business practices from now on.     htaccess help simtechs None Given June 27, 2003 5:23:49 PM EDT       Small Windows Application Appwalk Technologies Canada None Given May 24, 2002 4:39:38 PM EDT       PHP Search script (Ms Word, PDF etc) Nuno Fonseca None Given January 21, 2002 8:26:24 AM EDT       Fetching webpage and reformating.... Bryan B. 10 (Excellent) December 4, 2001 8:42:23 PM EDT   Nice kind person. Knew exactly what he/she wanted. I would love to work with this buyer again. :)     ------ Average:   7.66